Høgskolen i Innlandet
Høgskolen i Lillehammer er fra Høgskolen i Innlandet


Emnekode: MPSY3004

Semester: Vår
Antall studenter: 8
Kull:  2016
Emne ansvarlig: Svein Åge K. Johnsen

Obligatorisk litteratur- Trykt (ikke kompendiuminnhold)

Pensum kan kjøpes hos: SINN bok | bok.lillehammer@sinn.no

Clayton, S D. ed. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. OUP USA Oxford Library of Psychology .Kapittel: 6, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33.

Thaler, R.H. & Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale: Yale University Press.Kapittel: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12 og 16.

Obligatorisk litteratur – åpne nettressurser og e-ressurser fra HINN Lillehammers databaser. Trykk på lenke for å få tilgang til litteraturen

Goodwin, T. (2012). Why should we reject ‘nudge’. Politics, 32, 85-92.

Bissing-Olson, M. J., Fielding, K. S., Iyer, A. (2016). Experiences of pride, not guilt, predict pro-environmental behavior when pro-environmental descriptive norms are more positive. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 145-153.

Verplanken, B., & Roy, D. (2016). Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 127-134.

Norton, T. A., Zacher, H. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2014). Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 49-54.

Böhm, G., & Pfister, H.-R. (2000). Action tendencies and characteristics of environmental risks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 317-337. (Tilgjengelig på nett)

Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2013). Promoting purchases of sustainable groceries: An intervention study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 53-67.

Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2010). Can I Make a Difference? The Role of General and Domain-specific Self-efficacy in Sustainable Consumption Decisions. Umweltspsychologie, 14, 46-74.

Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., & Abrahamse, W. (2014). Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemporary Social Science, 9(4), 374-392.

Schultz, P.W. (2014). Strategies for Promoting Proenvironmental Behavior. European Psychologist, 19, 107–117.

Werner, C. M., White, P. H., Byerly, S., & Stoll, R. (2009). Signs that encourage internalized recycling: Clinical validation, weak messages and "creative elaboration". Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 193-202.

Otto, S., Kaiser, F. G., & Arnold, O. (2014). The Critical Challenge of Climate Change. Preventing Rebound and Promoting More Individual Irrationality. European Psychologist, 19, 96–106.

Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science: Meta-Analysis of Proenvironmental Behavior Experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44, 257-298.

Kaiser, F. G., Byrka, K., & Hartig, T. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s Paradigm for Attitude Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 351-367.

Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028-1038.

Bamberg, S. (2013). Applying the stage model of self-regulated behavioral change in a car use reduction intervention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 68-75.

Klöckner, C. A. (2014). The dynamics of purchasing an electric vehicle–A prospective longitudinal study of the decision-making process. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 103-116.

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273-291.

Tobler, C., Visschers, VHM., Michael Siegrist, M. (2012). Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 197-207.

Möser, G., & Bamberg, S. (2008). The effectiveness of soft transport policy measures: A critical assessment and meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 10-26.

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.

Lee, J. A., & Holden, S. J. S. (1999). Understanding the determinants of environmentally conscious behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 16(5), 373-392.

Swim, J. K., Stern, P. C., Doherty, T. J., Clayton, S., Reser, J. P., Weber, E. U., Gifford, R., Howard, G. S. (2011). Psychology’s Contributions to Understanding and Addressing Global Climate Change. American Psychologist, 66, 241-250.

Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 711-720.

Schultz, P. W., Bator, R. J., Large, L. B., Bruni, C. M., & Tabanico, J. J. (2013). Littering in Context: Personal and Environmental Predictors of Littering Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 45, 35-59.

Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434.

Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., & Gatersleben, B. (2012). The moral circle as a common motivational cause of cross-situational pro-environmentalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 539-545.

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Gifford, R., & Vlek, C. (2009). Factors influencing car use for commuting and the intention to reduce it: A question of self-interest or morality? Transportation Research Part F, 12, 317-324.

Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2008). Psychological correlates of car use: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part F, 11, 300-311.

Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125-141.

Bostrom, A., et al. (2012). Causal thinking and support for climate change policies: International survey findings. Global Environmental Change, 22, 210-222.

Tilhørende Studium

Master i miljøpsykologi (2016-2018)

Tilhørende emner

MPSY3004 Miljøatferd

20©09 Høgskolen i Lillehammer, Postboks 952, 2604 Lillehammer | Fakturaadresse | Telefon: 61 28 80 00 | E-post: post@hil.no |L